Comments on: Is the Sarah Palin Newsweek cover sexist? http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:18:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Niko http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4289 Niko Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:23:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4289 Nope, it's just a picture of her in a short outfit. Who cares?<br><b>References : </b><br> Nope, it’s just a picture of her in a short outfit. Who cares?
References :

]]> By: Danne http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4288 Danne Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:16:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4288 No. It's not like they were paparazzi and she was in her backyard. It was from a photo shoot for another magazine and Newsweek took the one that looked best. If she didn't want magazines to use it she shouldn't have taken it. She's just trying to stir up media attention so her book will sell.<br><b>References : </b><br> No. It’s not like they were paparazzi and she was in her backyard. It was from a photo shoot for another magazine and Newsweek took the one that looked best. If she didn’t want magazines to use it she shouldn’t have taken it. She’s just trying to stir up media attention so her book will sell.
References :

]]> By: Dior http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4287 Dior Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:33:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4287 yes because it trivializes her role as a politician. What would you think of obama if you saw him in jogging shorts an a gooofy smile on the front of news week?<br><b>References : </b><br> yes because it trivializes her role as a politician. What would you think of obama if you saw him in jogging shorts an a gooofy smile on the front of news week?
References :

]]> By: Rickey http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4286 Rickey Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:00:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4286 She's playing the feminist card. Words like sexist are standard buzz words. If you put yourself out there it's fair game. If she was black she would cry racism.<br><b>References : </b><br> She’s playing the feminist card. Words like sexist are standard buzz words. If you put yourself out there it’s fair game.

If she was black she would cry racism.
References :

]]> By: Anna Kournikova http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4285 Anna Kournikova Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:18:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4285 What? I am drooling over her legs!<br><b>References : </b><br> What? I am drooling over her legs!
References :

]]> By: Doctor House in the House http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist/#comment-4284 Doctor House in the House Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:32:59 +0000 http://www.murunner.com/runner-magazine/is-the-sarah-palin-newsweek-cover-sexist#comment-4284 It isn't sexist, it's was just a bad play on Newsweek's part to use a picture taken from a sports magazine to portray Sarah in a certain way. I didn't vote for Palin, but I do agree that Newsweek tends to take things too far sometimes in portraying celebrities and political figures in a certain way. But then again- all media does this! Why should we be surprised?<br><b>References : </b><br> It isn’t sexist, it’s was just a bad play on Newsweek’s part to use a picture taken from a sports magazine to portray Sarah in a certain way.

I didn’t vote for Palin, but I do agree that Newsweek tends to take things too far sometimes in portraying celebrities and political figures in a certain way. But then again- all media does this! Why should we be surprised?
References :

]]>